Read My Current Entry! . Read My Other Entries! . Krishnamurti - "Truth is a pathless land" . ! . Email Me! . Sign My Guestbook . X . Busnanu
"Men give me credit for some genius. All the genius I have lies in this; when I have a subject in hand, I study it profoundly. Day and night it is before me. My mind becomes pervaded with it. Then the effort that I have made is what people are pleased to call the fruit of genius. It is the fruit of labor and thought."
-- Alexander Hamilton
Welcome to the journal of a possible spiritual anarchist inconoclastic autodidact

In Love and Remembrance - 04 October, 2008
- - 21 April, 2008
Updating... - 23 March, 2008
"Are you SPARKLING?" - 12 March, 2007
- - 20 February, 2007



Follow My Bliss



Link me?

Powered by Copyright Button(TM)



Site Meter


Take the World's Smallest Political Quiz!


Jiddu Krishnamurti - Learn more...


CLICK & Watch a short film about Liberty FREE!


"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."


Alexander Hamilton - learn more...


the tragedy of PENNY MCCLURG is the tragedy of American society




Laissez Faire Class 101


What's a libertarian?
Click HERE to find out

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)



"A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law."--Justice John Marshall


M. K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence


What "the fog of war" means is: war is so complex it's beyond the ability of the human mind to comprehend all the variables. Our judgment, our understanding, are not adequate. And we kill people unnecessarily."

Terror Alert Level
FEAR IS PATRIOTIC!
BE AFRAID!


Charlie Rose on PBS?


NOW with David Brancaccio on PBS?


National Public Radio?


Watch & Learn on CSPAN?


Questioning Liberty?

What's an autodidact?


The Eagle Soars?


Become a Peacemaker?


Ontosophy.com arises as a consequence of a wish for peace; thus precipitating the enterprise of divesting suffering and encouraging liberation for all beings.

21 March, 2005 - "Peace is the Way"

�We can debate which tradition has the balance of truth, justice and wisdom. We can argue that neither tradition has a monopoly of political virtue, that both have something to say, that opposing principles may have more or less pertinence at different times. That's the point. We should be discussing principles, not making wholesale accusations with tendentious nicknames. Rational discussion is impossible if "left" and "right" are reduced to synonyms for good and evil. The essence of civility is the acknowledgment that even your enemy may have something to teach you.�
--Joseph Sobran


Before i begin know that I believe that people have a right to die in the modern world and a right to live. The Terry Shiavo case brings up many subjects and I do not feel I am knowledgable about it to make any judgement on this issue. Though another diarist, Ravenheart states her feelings beautifully and I couldn't have stated how I feel better than she did. I came across a White house news memo that i liked somehwat. I still regard President Bush and his administration as accomplices in world terrorism, that being terrorizing the people of the USA and those of the rest of the world, as well as being the worlds most heinous gangsters. In other words I find him and many in Washington, DC to be guilty of crimes against humanity and nature to the severest extent imaginable. Well here is the statement I applaud:

�The case of Terri Schiavo raises complex issues. Yet in instances like this one, where there are serious questions and substantial doubts, our society, our laws, and our courts should have a presumption in favor of life. Those who live at the mercy of others deserve our special care and concern. It should be our goal as a nation to build a culture of life, where all Americans are valued, welcomed, and protected - and that culture of life must extend to individuals with disabilities.�

But I do not entirely say that I go one way or the other as I just do not know enough about it to make a judgement. It is a omplex issue and the media politicizing of the issue disturbs me. if anything many of the problems and media attention arose from a family dispute. So yes I do praise this statement though most everything including this is hypocritical bullshit coming out of the White House. Some would LABEL me a PESSIMIST, though that just is an ignorant assessment due to the fact that it completely digresses from the issue in focus. It�s also shows an extreme amount of prejudice. Which is after all the root of IGNORANCE; before I myself digress any further I will finish on the issue by saying that in dealing with politics, look at the big picture, of which the dealings of money are always prevalent. Historian Henry Adams hit the nail on the when he stated that "Practical politics consists of ignoring facts."

On the issue of labeling, as well as stereotyping I find it to be one of the foundations of promoting ignorance. It is truly rooted in prejudice, as it is defined as it implies coming to a judgment on a subject before learning where the preponderance of the evidence actually lies. Stereotypes and labels have long been used by those who distort things to their own ends for their own devious purposes. The sad part of this is that many whom they use these stereotypes against will in due time use them in everyday life. They will actually even defend them! Why does someone of darker skin tone say the word �nigger� in reference to those of the same visual likeness? It is a most negative word which is rooted in the most dreadful definitions and racism, but it is a common word today more than ever. There are many other stereotypes, labels, etc that have been slipped into the ignorant masses, while many have fought this. Martin Luther King Jr. fought it, many as I do fight it to this day. But in the underlying communication of many it seeps through, undermining all positive discourse.

Then it grows too, just think (which sadly most have no idea how to do, which maybe the true underlying problem of humanity) how the labels in a hateful manner one hears of different peoples, religions, political beliefs, sexuality in everyday life. It reeks of utter hatred and intolerance. This ignorance goes forth that one would categorize and judge others and various subjects without even hearing of the details. Hence again prejudice, and anyone doing such is a fool. Go forth and judge all you like as I will not join with you on your fools journey into hatred and ultimate doom. Who�s more foolish really, the foolish one or the one who follows in his footsteps? It is so easy to take the bait and give into hatred, and takes such courage to step away from judging and clear ones mind of such. So when one hears about all those damn liberals, the evil libertarians, those �evil� GOP assholes, think. Think about it when fools go back and forth in such a violent manner on �CROSSFIRE� or on FOX news. Down below and to the right there is a quote by Martin Luther King Jr which states "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." That is true and the way, yes peace is the way.

"There is no way to peace. Peace is the way."
--A. J. Muste



There is an article on current politics I enjoyed by Joseph Farah, of which so for anyone reading that it was written before President Bush came into office, so if anyone is curious as why he isn�t included:

***

I've believed for some time now that the greatest threat to America's freedoms is not from socialism or communism but rather an "ism" you seldom hear much about these days -- fascism.
We're not just slouching toward Gomorrah, as Robert Bork has written. We're slouching toward Rome.
To understand what I mean, most people need to rethink their notions about the political spectrum. At the left end, most people agree, you have communism -- total government control over the means of production and property. It's at the other end of the spectrum that many get confused.
Ask most left-wingers and they'll suggest that fascism is on the extreme right -- 180 degrees from communism. Unh-uh. I've got news for you, friends. Fascism and communism are ideological kissin' cousins. I would place fascism and any other brand of socialism just a few degrees to the right of communism.
Remember, both fascism and socialism mean -- to one degree or another -- government control of production and distribution. The only thing that distinguishes fascism from socialism in economic theory is how they get that control and how they maintain it.
Fascists realize the government doesn't need to own industry to control it. Through regulation and taxation, fascists know they can achieve the same results without nearly as much work and responsibility.
Fascism, of course, has become a dirty word because of its association with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. But just because none dare speak its name doesn't mean it is dead. Fascism is actually on the rise today precisely because no one recognizes it for what it is and calls a spade a spade.
It is in wide practice today in what we call Communist China. Beijing has not achieved communism. And instead of moving toward the Marxist-Leninist goal, it is moving steadily toward fascism -- a hideous blend of state and private partnership. And guess what? The United States is moving in the same direction. Every time you hear Bill Clinton or one of his fellow travelers talk about "public-private partnerships" I want you to understand what they are talking about -- fascism, pure and simple. Is it any wonder Clinton gets along so well with his buddies in Beijing? Think of how Rome, Berlin and Tokyo matched up so well in 1939.
So what's at the other end of that political spectrum? This surprises a lot of people, but it's really quite logical, if you think about it. If total government control in the form of communism is at the left end, wouldn't it make sense that anarchy -- no government control -- is at the extreme right?
I envision many libertarians nodding in agreement as they read this. So where do they fit in? Just a few degrees to the left of the anarchists, of course. Conservatives, favoring less government as they do, would find themselves 20 or 30 degrees to the left of the libertarians, while liberals could shake hands with the socialists and fascists to their left.
And that's really why we're facing a serious threat today. You see, most liberals think they hate fascism. They equate it, understandably, with Nazism, Hitler, Mussolini, racism, anti-Semitism and imperialism. But they forget what the definition of fascism is.
Listen, Bill Clinton is no democratic socialist. He's no Marxist. He's a pragmatic politician -- just like Mussolini. Like his predecessor's dream of making the trains run on time, Clinton's goal is for the economy to lumber along at a 2.5 percent growth rate. Whatever deals need to be cut with big business to make that happen are OK with him. If he needs to sell some corporate favors for campaign contributions, that's just political expediency. If he feels it's time to arm the Environmental Protection Agency to put more teeth into enforcement of the Endangered Species Act, who could blame him?
It's not just economic, either. Look at the way we have abdicated our individual liberties in favor of "group rights." That's a fascist concept. Look at the way we demonize certain groups (whether you're talking about smokers or Bible-believing Christians) and elevate others (native Americans and homosexuals come to mind as the new noblemen or chosen people) in our society. That, too, is a fascist concept.
One of the reasons America is moving toward fascism today is because it has lost its constitutional moorings. We're supposed to believe in limited government in the United States. The federal powers are enumerated in the Constitution. But, in recent years, Washington has far exceeded its authority. And very few politicians -- Democrats or Republicans -- seem to give a darn.
Even worse, most Americans don't even seem to be aware of the problem.
Is there any hope? Well, unless we understand what we're up against, it's difficult to fight it. We have to redefine our terms, comprehend the nature of the beast. That's always a good first step on the road back to freedom.

***

"We begin from the recognition that all beings cherish happiness and do not want suffering. It then becomes both morally wrong and pragmatically unwise to pursue only one's own happiness oblivious to the feelings and aspirations of all others who surround us as members of the same human family. The wiser course is to think of others when pursuing our own happiness."
-- Dalai Lama, Awarded Nobel Peace Prize 1989

"Whatever you do, you need courage. Whatever course you decide upon, there is always someone to tell you that you are wrong. There are always difficulties arising that tempt you to believe your critics are right. To map out a course of action and follow it to an end requires some of the same courage that a soldier needs. Peace has its victories, but it takes brave men and women to win them."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson, American essayist and abolitionist

"Do you want me to tell you something really subversive? Love is everything it's cracked up to be. That's why people are so cynical about it... It really is worth fighting for, being brave for, risking everything for. And the trouble is, if you don't risk anything, you risk even more."
-- Erica Jong, American author and educator

If in our daily life we can smile, if we can be peaceful and happy, not only we, but everyone will profit from it. This is the most basic kind of peace work."
-- Thich Nhat Hanh

�Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.�
-- Martin Luther King Jr., Awarded Nobel Peace Prize 1964

"Until he extends his circle of compassion to all living things, man will not himself find peace."
-- Albert Schweitzer, Awarded Nobel Peace Prize 1953

"Change and Growth take place when a person has risked himself and dares to become involved with experimenting with his own life."
-- Herbert Otto

"If you judge people, you have no time to love them."
-- Mother Theresa, Awarded Nobel Peace Prize 1979

"Don't walk behind me, I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend."
-- Albert Camus, French author and philosopher

"What would you call President Clinton? A conservative? No, no, no. A liberal? No, no, no. He wouldn`t like that. Well, then, what do you call him? And if the word "conservative" meant anything, why would George Bush have to come from Texas, where he was a conservative, and suddenly become a "compassionate conservative"? And if "Democrat" meant anything, why would you have to run as a "new" Democrat? Why would you need those mitigating muck-up words attached to the label, if the label told you about the -- so the labels don`t mean anything."
-- Mario Cuomo, American lawyer and politician

"True love of country is not mere blind partisanship. It is regard for the people of one's country and all of them; it is a feeling of fellowship and brotherhood for all of them; it is a desire for the prosperity and happiness of all of them; it is kindly and considerate judgment toward all of them. The first duty of popular self-government is individual self-control. The essential condition of true progress is that it shall be based upon grounds of reason, and not prejudice. Lincoln's noble sentiment of charity for all and malice toward none was not a specific for the Civil War, but is a living principle of action."
-- Elihu Root, Awarded Nobel Peace Prize 1912

�You think that good is hating what is bad. What is bad is the hating mind itself.�
-- Bon Kai, Buddhist monk

�Ten years ago I saw peace as a tangible goal. Today I see peace a little differently. Peacemakers, I have gradually recognized, function in the world much like kidneys function in our bodies, constantly, unendingly removing the wastes and poisons which are an inevitable part of our lives. As long as we live, the poisons of hate, injustice, and misunderstanding will be produced, and peacemakers will be needed to clean up the mess.�
-- Barbara Stanford

�We know that dominating does not work in normal circumstances. Authoritarian organizations are much less effective than participative ones. In authoritarian organizations morale is low, people cease to care and tend to work against each other instead of co-operating with each other for the benefit of the organization.�
-- Manfred Davidmann

"The potential for violence and abuse in an authoritarian cult is always there, not only because whatever the leader says goes, but also because outsiders are made into "the Other," which has always been used to justify violence."
-- Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad, from The Guru Papers: Masks of Authoritarian

"Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others."
-- Edward Abbey, American author and essayist

"I think this is the case in the great majority of authoritarian states: on the surface, because of repression, everything seems frozen, but when the sun comes out and the ice melts, you find that there was a lot of life underneath all along."
-- Aung San Suu Kyi, Awarded Nobel Peace Prize 1991

"We are at heart so profoundly anarchistic that the only form of state we can imagine living in is Utopian; and so cynical that the only Utopia we can believe in is authoritarian."
-- Lionel Trilling, Literary critic, author, and educator

As always comments are welcome and yes the comments section is up and running again.



3 is number of those whom left COMMENTARY, if you would like too please click here.

about Hamiltonian - read my profile! don't read other Diar
yLand diaries! recommend my diary to a friend! Get
 your own fun + free diary at DiaryLand.com!

All Content � 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Author of http://hamiltonian.diaryland.com/ All Rights Reserved!